Job 41 (Part 3), Dragons Across Cultures: From Babylon to Britain
The Universal Dragon Memory: Why do cultures separated by thousands of miles (and oceans!) tell the same story?
Hello brothers and sisters.
In Parts 1 and 2, we established that Job 41 describes something matching what we would call a dragon, and that ancient Jewish translators understood it that way. But this raises a fascinating question: Why do cultures all over the world— many with no contact with each other —describe remarkably similar creatures?
If you missed either of the first two posts, you can get caught up below:
Is this proof that dragons are universal human fantasies, archetypal fears wired into our psychology? Or is it evidence that these cultures are all remembering something real?
Before we can answer that question, we need to understand just how widespread dragon traditions are, and how remarkably consistent their descriptions remain across time and distance.
Let’s dive in to discover if the biblical Leviathan is an isolated oddity or part of a global pattern.
If you’re reading this in email, be aware that the text is likely to cut off without warning. For a smoother reading experience and all the features Substack has to offer (including audio voiceovers of my posts), you can go HERE or download the app.
Now, before we dive into a fascinating exploration of Mesopotamian Dragons and how they relate to the Leviathan of Job, I have something I want to share. I know we’re all pretty much always on the lookout for inspiring, informational, and interesting new books and authors, so here are two pages with more than 20 books each that you can pick up for free, all you have to do is share your email address!
And as you’ll see on these pages, I have finished and published my book, The Septuagint: An Introductory Analysis that goes deep on a range of topics that I don’t have the space to go into here. You can get the digital edition (available exclusively to my subscribers) for free by signing up on the page above or by subscribing to my publication further down toward the bottom of this article.
Now, let’s dive into Scripture and mythology!
The Mesopotamian Dragons
Let’s start where civilization itself started: Mesopotamia, the land between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. This is the region of Babylon, Assyria, and Sumer, and it’s saturated with dragon mythology.
Tiamat: The Chaos Dragon
The Babylonian creation epic Enūma Eliš (dating to approximately 1700 BC, with oral roots possibly reaching back to 2000 BC or earlier) begins with Tiamat, the primordial goddess of the salt sea. Her name derives from ti’amtum, meaning “sea,” and scholars have noted its linguistic connection to the Hebrew תְּהוֹם (tehom), “the deep” or “the abyss,” used in Genesis 1:2.
Tiamat is described as a dragon goddess who births monsters and wages war against the younger gods. The epic describes her creating an army of creatures: giant serpents, storm demons, fish-men, scorpion-men, and other hybrid beasts. When the god Marduk finally defeats her, he does so with winds, a net, a club, and arrows. All of which are notably similar to the weapons that Job 41 says are useless against Leviathan.
After killing Tiamat, Marduk splits her body in half to create heaven and earth. Her weeping eyes become the sources of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Her tail becomes the Milky Way.
What’s striking is that Tiamat possesses many of the same characteristics as the biblical Leviathan:
Association with primordial waters
Dragon or serpent form
Enormous size and power
Connection to creation narrative
Defeated (or controlled) by deity
The key difference? In Babylonian mythology, Tiamat is an enemy deity who must be killed. Biblically, Leviathan is God’s creature and made on Day Five, powerful but still under divine authority. The Bible demythologizes the dragon; it’s not a rival god to be defeated, but a creature to be marveled at as evidence of God’s creative power.
The Mušḫuššu: The Dragon of Babylon
Ancient Mesopotamia also featured the mušḫuššu (meaning “furious serpent” or “splendid serpent”), a dragon with a serpent’s body, lion’s forelimbs, and bird-like hind legs. This creature was the sacred animal of Marduk and later the god Nabu. Its image was emblazoned on the famous Ishtar Gate of Babylon, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.
The mušḫuššu wasn’t considered mythological by the ancient Babylonians. It was depicted alongside actual animals like lions and bulls on the Ishtar Gate. To them, it was simply another creature in God’s (or the gods’) creation. More exotic than lions, certainly, but not imaginary.
When the Greek historian Herodotus visited Babylon in the 5th century BC, priests told him about sacred serpents kept in the temples. Later Greek writers described seeing dragon-like creatures in the region. Were these exaggerations? Misidentifications? Or remnant populations of creatures that were once more common?
The Ugaritic/Canaanite Dragons
Moving west from Mesopotamia to the coast of modern-day Syria, we come to Ugarit, an ancient city-state that flourished during the time of Israel’s judges. In the late 1920s, archaeologists discovered clay tablets there containing what we now call the Baal Cycle, which are a collection of mythological texts that have striking parallels to biblical descriptions.
Lōtān: The Twisted Serpent
The Ugaritic texts describe a creature named Lōtān (or Litan)—linguistically cognate with the Hebrew לִוְיָתָן (livyatan, Leviathan). The text describes Lōtān as:
“The fleeing serpent” (bṯn brḥ)
“The twisting serpent” (bṯn ʿqltn)
“The tyrant with seven heads” (šlyṭ d.šbʿt rašm)
Compare this to Isaiah 27:1, where God promises to punish “Leviathan the fleeing serpent, Leviathan the twisting serpent” and “the dragon (tannin) that is in the sea.”
The parallel is unmistakable. The prophet is using language borrowed directly from Canaanite mythology, yet with a crucial difference. In the Ugaritic texts, the god Baal defeats Lōtān to establish his kingship. In Isaiah, God will judge this creature at the end of the age. So it could be said that the biblical text takes a known creature and places it within Israel’s theology.
Yamm: The Sea God Dragon
The Baal Cycle also tells of Yamm (meaning “sea”), a deity with dragon-like characteristics who battles Baal for supremacy. With the help of the craftsman god Kothar, who creates magical clubs, Baal defeats Yamm and becomes king of the gods.
This combat myth— god versus sea dragon —appears throughout ancient Near Eastern literature. But notice something interesting here: the combat is always between spiritual beings (gods fighting gods or demigods). When the biblical text references such creatures, it’s not about God defeating an equal opponent. God is the unchallenged Creator; these creatures are His creations. Psalm 104:26 even says God made Leviathan “to play in” the sea. Almost as though it’s His pet.
The biblical writers were almost certainly familiar with these stories. They used the same vocabulary. So while a purely scholarly perspective might be that they transformed the narrative to emphasize monotheism and divine sovereignty, a literal reading of the text suggests that events and creatures described in the Bible may have been appropriated by surrounding cultures. In either event, the dragons aren’t rival gods but rather they’re remarkable but created beings.
The Egyptian Serpent
Egypt adds its own voice to the ancient Near Eastern chorus of dragon traditions.
Apep (Apophis): The Serpent of Chaos
In Egyptian mythology, Apep (also called Apophis) is a colossal serpent that dwells in the underworld. Each night, the sun god Ra must journey through the underworld on his solar barque, and each night Apep attempts to devour him. The Bremner-Rhind papyrus describes Apep as causing thunderstorms and earthquakes with his roars.
Unlike Tiamat or Lōtān, Apep is never defeated permanently. He must be fought and driven back every single night. The eternal nature of this combat reflects Egyptian cyclical theology; the daily struggle between order and chaos, light and darkness.
The parallels to Leviathan are clear:
Serpentine form
Enormous size
Connection to water/chaos
Opposition to divine order
Defeated but not destroyed
In Ezekiel 29:3 and 32:2, God compares Pharaoh to “the great dragon (tannin) that lies in the midst of his streams.” The prophet uses dragon imagery to describe Egypt’s king and thereby linking him to the ancient serpent of chaos that Egyptian theology itself acknowledged.
The Biblical Network: Leviathan, Tannin, and Rahab
Before we move beyond the ancient Near East, we need to understand that the Bible itself uses multiple terms for these creatures, and they’re interconnected:
Tannin (תַּנִּין): Dragon/Sea Monster
This term appears throughout Scripture:
Genesis 1:21: God creates the “great tanninim“ (plural) on Day Five
Exodus 7:9-10: Aaron’s staff becomes a tannin before Pharaoh
Psalm 74:13: God breaks the heads of tanninim in the waters
Isaiah 27:1: Leviathan is called a tannin in the sea
Ezekiel 29:3; 32:2: Pharaoh is compared to a great tannin
The Septuagint consistently translates tannin as δράκων (drakōn or dragon) in most of these passages. Although English translators alternate between serpent and dragon, the ancient translators understood these to be the same type of creature as Leviathan.
Rahab (רַהַב): The Sea Monster
Rahab (not to be confused with Rahab the harlot of Jericho, which has a different Hebrew spelling) is another sea creature mentioned in Scripture:
Job 9:13: “God will not turn back his anger; beneath him bowed the helpers of Rahab”
Job 26:12: “By his understanding he shattered Rahab”
Psalm 89:10: “You crushed Rahab like a carcass”
Isaiah 51:9: “Was it not you who cut Rahab in pieces, who pierced the dragon (tannin)?”
Notice that in Isaiah 51:9, Rahab and tannin are used in parallel, so they’re either the same creature or the same type of creature. Some scholars suggest Rahab might be a proper name for one particular dragon, while tannin and livyatan are category terms.
The Biblical Pattern
The biblical writers use this vocabulary with familiarity. They reference these creatures naturally, assuming their audience knows what they’re talking about. This is the language of assumed reality, not mythology or metaphor.
When Job 26:13 says, “By his breath the heavens were made fair; his hand pierced the fleeing serpent,” and when Isaiah 27:1 promises God will punish “Leviathan the fleeing serpent,” they’re using established terminology for a known type of creature.
The Chinese Lóng: The Benevolent Dragon
Now let’s jump drastically east to China, a civilization with no cultural contact with ancient Mesopotamia or Israel during its formative period. And yet...
The Chinese Dragon Tradition
The Chinese lóng (龍) is central to Chinese mythology and culture from the earliest recorded periods. Unlike Western dragons, Chinese dragons are generally benevolent, associated with:
Water (rivers, seas, rain)
Weather control
Wisdom and imperial power
Good fortune and prosperity
The Four Dragon Kings rule the four seas surrounding China. The Emperor himself was called the “Dragon Face.” Dragon imagery saturates Chinese art, architecture, and literature going back thousands of years.
The Striking Similarities
Despite the cultural gulf between China and the ancient Near East, consider these parallels:
Serpentine form: Chinese dragons are long, sinuous, snake-like creatures. This presents virtually identical imagery to the Hebrew livyatan, which means “twisted” or “coiled.”
Water association: Chinese dragons rule the seas and control rain. Leviathan is explicitly a sea creature. Tiamat is the salt sea personified.
Power over weather: Chinese dragons bring storms and floods. Job 41:31 says Leviathan makes the sea boil. Ancient Near Eastern dragons are connected to chaos waters.
Cultural significance: Chinese dragons are emblems of ultimate power. The biblical text says Leviathan is “king over all that are proud” (Job 41:34). Both traditions treat dragons as supreme among creatures.
Reality assumption: Ancient Chinese culture treated dragons as real creatures, rare but genuine. Biblical and ancient Near Eastern texts do the same.
The typical explanation for these parallels is independent invention. Suggesting that humans everywhere fear snakes and fear the sea, so they create serpent-sea-monster myths independently. But is that really the best explanation? Or is it more plausible that ancient cultures worldwide retained memories of actual creatures, interpreting them through their various theological and cultural lenses?
European Dragons: The Western Tradition
The European dragon tradition— familiar from medieval legends, fairy tales, and fantasy literature —emerged much later than the ancient Near Eastern sources we’ve been examining. But it’s worth noting because it demonstrates continuity of tradition.
Common Characteristics
Medieval European dragons typically feature:
Reptilian/serpentine form
Fire-breathing ability
Scales impervious to weapons
Guarding hoards of treasure
Dwelling in caves or water
Requiring heroes with special weapons/divine help to defeat
Look at that list again. Every single one of these characteristics appears in Job 41. The European tradition (for which we have concrete evidence to at least the 5th century B.C. and more interpretive evidence going back much, much further), independently preserves the same core features.
The Persistence of Dragon Belief
What’s remarkable is how late European dragon belief persisted. We’re not talking about ancient superstition that ended with classical civilization. We’re talking about reports continuing well into the medieval and early modern periods:
Marco Polo described seeing dragons in China in the 13th century AD
European bestiaries (encyclopedias of animals) included dragons alongside real animals through the 16th century. In fact, this continued in some natural history texts and accounts up until the 17th and even 18th centuries.
Reports of dragon-like creatures appear in explorers’ accounts from Africa, Asia, and the Americas
Were all of these fabrications? Mass delusions? Or were people occasionally encountering remnant populations of creatures that had once been more common?
The Norse Tradition
Norse mythology adds another data point, this time from Scandinavia:
Jörmungandr: The World Serpent
Norse legend tells of Jörmungandr, an enormous serpent that encircles the entire earth, dwelling in the ocean depths. At Ragnarök (the end of the world), Jörmungandr will release its tail and come to shore, poisoning the sky with its venom. Thor will slay it but die from its poison.
Notice the pattern:
Enormous serpent
Dwells in the sea
Connected to end-times judgment
Requires divine power to defeat
This is the same pattern we’ve seen in Mesopotamian, Canaanite, Egyptian, and biblical sources, now appearing independently in northern Europe with no cultural connection to the ancient Near East.
Fáfnir: The Treasure-Guarding Dragon
The Volsunga saga tells of Fáfnir, who transforms into a dragon and guards a hoard of cursed gold. The hero Sigurd must slay him with a special sword, striking him from below where his scales don’t protect him.
The detail about vulnerable spots despite otherwise impenetrable scales is telling. It suggests practical knowledge, as though the stories emerged from encounters with real creatures whose armor had weak points.
The Pattern Cannot Be Ignored
Let’s step back and look at what we’ve discovered:
Mesopotamia (2000+ BC): Tiamat, the salt sea dragon; mušḫuššu, the serpent-dragon
Canaan/Ugarit (1500-1200 BC): Lōtān, the seven-headed twisting serpent; Yamm, the sea god
Egypt (1500+ B.C.): Apep, the chaos serpent of the underworld
Israel (2000-500 B.C.): Leviathan/tannin/Rahab, sea dragons in God’s creation
China (2000+ B.C.): Lóng, water dragons controlling seas and weather
Greece (800+ B.C.): Python, Ladon, and other drakones
Norse lands (800+ A.D.): Jörmungandr, Fáfnir, and other serpent-dragons
Medieval Europe (400 B.C. - 1500 A.D.): Fire-breathing, treasure-guarding dragons
Across thousands of miles and thousands of years, in cultures with no contact with each other, we find the same basic creature described:
✓ Serpentine/reptilian form
✓ Enormous size
✓ Association with water (especially seas)
✓ Scales or armor
✓ Sometimes fire or poison
✓ Extreme power requiring divine/heroic intervention
✓ Often multiple heads
✓ Connection to primordial chaos or end times
The Two Explanations
There are essentially two ways to explain this pattern:
Explanation 1: Universal Human Psychology
This is the standard academic explanation: humans everywhere fear snakes, fear the sea, and fear chaos. So they independently invent serpents/sea-monsters to embody these fears. The dragon is an archetype, a psychological projection, a metaphor made concrete by primitive minds.
This explanation requires:
Remarkable coincidence (independent cultures arriving at nearly identical creatures)
Psychological determinism (human fears must produce this specific form)
Dismissal of descriptive details (fire-breathing, bioluminescence, specific scale patterns, impervious to weapons, etc., all dismissed as fantasy elaboration)
Ignoring the reality claims (ancient people thought these were real, but they were all apparently wrong)
Explanation 2: Cultural Memory
The alternative explanation is simpler: ancient cultures describe similar creatures because they’re remembering the same creatures. These creatures existed, were encountered by various peoples, and those encounters were remembered and passed down through oral tradition and eventually written records.
As these creatures became rarer or even extinct, and as centuries passed, the stories naturally accumulated mythological and theological interpretations according to each culture’s worldview. But the core memory— large serpentine creatures, aquatic, powerful, dangerous —remained consistent because it was based on reality.
This explanation requires:
A straightforward reading of ancient sources (they meant what they said).
Acceptance that megafauna existed in the ancient world that don’t exist today.
Recognition that ancient people were competent observers of nature.
Willingness to question modern naturalistic assumptions.
The Biblical Contribution
Here’s what makes the biblical testimony unique among ancient dragon traditions:
1. Demythologization: The Bible strips dragons of divinity. They’re not gods, not demons (though they can symbolize evil powers), but creatures. Powerful creatures, yes, but creatures nonetheless. Made by God, subject to God, existing for God’s purposes.
2. Creation Context: Genesis 1:21 places the tanninim squarely in the creation week, made on Day Five. They’re not primordial chaos that pre-exists creation; they’re part of creation itself.
3. Detailed Description: Job 41 provides by far the most detailed physical description of such a creature in any ancient literature. Thirty-four verses of specific characteristics; scales, fire-breathing, bioluminescence, size, habitat, behavior. This is clear description, not vague mythological poetry.
4. Divine Purpose: Psalm 104:26 says God made Leviathan “to play” in the sea. Job 41 presents it as an exhibit of God’s creative power. The biblical texts assert that even these terrifying creatures serve divine purposes.
5. Eschatological Role: Isaiah 27:1 connects Leviathan to end-times judgment. Revelation 12-13 uses dragon imagery for Satan and his agents. The biblical tradition maintains continuity between literal creatures and their symbolic theological significance.
The Question of Survival
If these creatures were real, where are they now?
This question assumes that every species that ever existed must still exist, which is demonstrably false. The fossil record is full of creatures that no longer exist. The last few centuries have seen the extinction of the dodo, the passenger pigeon, the Tasmanian tiger, and countless others.
Large predators, especially aquatic ones, are notoriously difficult to study even when we know they exist. We didn’t get footage of a living giant squid until 2004, and we still know very little about their biology. The coelacanth was thought extinct for 66 million years until one was caught in 1938. And there are probably still multiple (if not myriad!) species we don’t know about.
The deep oceans remain largely unexplored. We have better maps of Mars than of our own ocean floor. If dragon-like creatures existed in ancient times, and if they were rare even then, it’s entirely plausible that remnant populations could persist undetected (especially if they are as intelligent as many of the myths suggest). Or it could be that they went extinct sometime in the last 2-3 millennia.
The absence of proof, especially for rare aquatic megafauna, is not proof of absence.
The Implication for Job 41
Here’s why this cross-cultural survey matters for understanding Job 41:
When God describes Leviathan to Job, He’s not inventing a creature for rhetorical effect. He’s not speaking poetically about chaos or Satan (though Leviathan can secondarily symbolize such things). He’s describing a creature that Job would have understood as real because everyone in the ancient world knew such creatures existed.
The consistency of dragon descriptions across cultures supports the biblical text’s literal reading. Far from being an isolated myth, Job 41 is part of a global testimony to the existence of creatures we now call dragons but which ancient peoples simply called by their various names: dragon, Leviathan, tannin, Lōtān, Tiamat, Apep, lóng, etc.
Coming Up Next
In Part 4, we’ll explore the world of Genesis 6, the Nephilim, and the fragmentary Book of Giants found among the Dead Sea Scrolls. We’ll examine the possibility that the antediluvian world— the world before the Flood —contained not only human giants but the megafauna they contended with. And we’ll see what happens when we take seriously the idea that the days of Noah were days when dragons and giants both walked the earth.
The pieces are starting to come together. And they’re forming a picture that’s far stranger— and far more interesting —than we might have expected.
If you’ve found this helpful or insightful, please share it with a friend who loves Scripture as much as you do.
And if you want to go deeper with a full exploration of the “70 Weeks” of Daniel 9, a deep exploration of biblical idolatry with modern context, and other exclusive content, consider becoming a paid subscriber. Your support makes this work possible.
On the other hand, if you appreciate what I’m doing and want to support this work but aren’t interested in a membership, please consider buying me a coffee as a one-time show of support
And in case you missed it, one last time here’s the look to those books you can pick up for free if any of them interest you (full disclosure, I’m picking up The Gospel of John by Dr. Andrew C S Koh myself!)
© 2025 LXX Scrolls. All rights reserved.